This is part 5 of 5 in the series “Origin of Public Education.”
How much has public education changed in the United States over the last 30 years?
…*Crickets*…
If you compare this time period in the US with most others in its young 250 year (or so) history, you will find that something seems stuck in the cogs of meaningful evolution of academic growth.
The first two hundred years of establishing this country was spent fighting for freedom of various flavors. By the mid 1900’s education was not only a right, but compulsory, for all children of age regardless of color, socio economics, gender and ability. With all kids getting educated, one would expect literacy rates to sky rocket and public schooling being one of the most valued national treasures of this country. No snickering, please.
But before we can even get to the dialogue of quality versus quantity, and whether or not we have to give up one for the other, we need to answer the first question of this blog: What happened in the 1980’s?
Well, by now you know that there was a report titled a Nation at Risk, which settled the rumors that American Education was a flop in this paraphrase: We are doomed.
And in international comparisons?—We were putting me in mediocrity.
But instead of the swift response when the Sputnik had taunted the US as runner up, the efficiency in how reforms issued by president Regan and congress were executed was…well…mediocre.
In short, the reforms recommended were: Teaching. More teaching. Here is what to teach. Money. More money. And kids—We expect more of you as a result.
It’s curious, because recommendations for reform since then look eerily familiar, but don new pseudonyms. And of course a new budget.
Bill Clinton passed the Improving America’s Schools Act in 1994, George W Bush signed No Child Left Behind into law in 2001, and Barack Obama has made some amendments based on similar philosophies. But you know what they say about doing the same thing over and over, but expecting a different result.
The timeline we have covered is a snapshot via blog and does not even come close to covering every event, presidency or man-made impression on US public education. And as each day adds to our timeline of history like a living document, we too are part of making it.
Here are the concluding thoughts of this series:
Throughout this country’s young history the promise that all men are equal has sparked many civil right debates. None less is education. The fundamental questions have not changed much over time:
- Who is public education designed for? Who is “the public” in public education? Is it the children in our classrooms? The staff hired using our tax-moneys? Or is it the taxpayers themselves?
- What defines success? Does every child really have the right to equal access of such?
To this day, is access to education fair or equal? Although sex, color and creed are no longer a determining factor in compulsory education, income and socioeconomics still play a role in the equal access part. Millions of children today attend schools that are considered subpar from all sorts of aspects, academically lacking, and in some cases unsafe. Should the family be fortunate to be able to pay twice for education (taxes to keep the subpar area school still afloat, while paying out of pocket for other schooling), they have options that other families don’t.
This is where the next civil rights battle in education may lie.
Subscribe to this blog. Like us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.





