Public Education: The next civil rights battle

This is part 5 of 5 in the series “Origin of Public Education.”

How much has public education changed in the United States over the last 30 years?

…*Crickets*…

If you compare this time period in the US with most others in its young 250 year (or so) history, you will find that something seems stuck in the cogs of meaningful evolution of academic growth.

The first two hundred years of establishing this country was spent fighting for freedom of various flavors. By the mid 1900’s education was not only a right, but compulsory, for all children of age regardless of color, socio economics, gender and ability. With all kids getting educated, one would expect literacy rates to sky rocket and public schooling being one of the most valued national treasures of this country. No snickering, please.

But before we can even get to the dialogue of quality versus quantity, and whether or not we have to give up one for the other, we need to answer the first question of this blog: What happened in the 1980’s?

 Well, by now you know that there was a report titled a Nation at Risk, which settled the rumors that American Education was a flop in this paraphrase: We are doomed.

And in international comparisons?—We were putting me in mediocrity.

But instead of the swift response when the Sputnik had taunted the US as runner up, the efficiency in how reforms issued by president Regan and congress were executed was…well…mediocre.

In short, the reforms recommended were: Teaching. More teaching. Here is what to teach. Money. More money. And kids—We expect more of you as a result.

It’s curious, because recommendations for reform since then look eerily familiar, but don new pseudonyms. And of course a new budget.

Bill Clinton passed the Improving America’s Schools Act in 1994, George W Bush signed No Child Left Behind into law in 2001, and Barack Obama has made some amendments based on similar philosophies. But you know what they say about doing the same thing over and over, but expecting a different result.

The timeline we have covered is a snapshot via blog and does not even come close to covering every event, presidency or man-made impression on US public education. And as each day adds to our timeline of history like a living document, we too are part of making it.

Here are the concluding thoughts of this series:

Throughout this country’s young history the promise that all men are equal has sparked many civil right debates. None less is education. The fundamental questions have not changed much over time:

  • Who is public education designed for? Who is “the public” in public education? Is it the children in our classrooms? The staff hired using our tax-moneys? Or is it the taxpayers themselves?
  • What defines success? Does every child really have the right to equal access of such?

To this day, is access to education fair or equal? Although sex, color and creed are no longer a determining factor in compulsory education, income and socioeconomics still play a role in the equal access part. Millions of children today attend schools that are considered subpar from all sorts of aspects, academically lacking, and in some cases unsafe. Should the family be fortunate to be able to pay twice for education (taxes to keep the subpar area school still afloat, while paying out of pocket for other schooling), they have options that other families don’t.

This is where the next civil rights battle in education may lie.

Subscribe to this blog. Like us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

 

Share

History of Public Education IV: Cold war, monkeys, and Johnny who cannot write

This is Part IV in the series History of Public Education.

In just a century and a half, give or take, public education United States by the 1950’s had gone from infant beginnings to the largest schooling system in the world; scared by wars and calloused by politics. The American public education system was celebrated by many as the best in the world. Until, one Soviet Union satellite Sputniked into space, that is. What a blow to US National pride!

If the United States of America had the best education in the world, then why was it not first in space? The power of acquired knowledge and innovation in science, and its impact on national security, was fresh on people’s mind since World War II. It wasn’t long before US officials responded by beefing up science in its schools. The National Defense Education Act was passed in 1958 to finance both scientific research and education. So away went the trend about home economics and—hello, Cold-War-style science education!

About a decade later the United States of America was the first to land on the moon.

Many milestones in US history which relates to education can be listed off: The passing of the Civil Rights Act (about time!), the Immigration Act, Bilingual Education Act (later repealed and replaced with No Child Left Behind), and of course—another round of “Monkey Trials.” Darwinists had been long been fighting for their right to teach evolution in schools. In the 1920’s the appeals had lost in court. This time though, Epperson v. Arkansas, was ruled in favor of monkey business, and prohibiting teaching of evolution as a theory considered unconstitutional based on the first amendment.

But even in the wake of the Civil Rights movement, there were some children who still were left out. It wasn’t until 1971 and the case of Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v. Pennsylvania that children who were classified as “mentally retarded” were legally allowed a free public education.

But don’t underestimate the power of the press. A 1975 Newsweek story called Why Johnny Can’t Write sparked strong interest in back-to-basic education. No, not science. Not wood-wittling either. The other stuff; reading, writing, and math. What a concept!

One wonders what how history would be different if former president Ronald Regan had actually carried out his vow to abolish the Department of Education. The DOE had attained cabinet status during the Carter era, which is a direct eye-poke for those who believe in market education. Alas, we cannot do more than speculate because the dis never materialized beyond campaign promise.

But Regan didn’t sit idle when it came to education. In 1983 the National Commission of Excellence in Education issued a report titled A Nation at Risk.”  Americans were once more reminded that our schools were not as hot as we thought. Or as the report’s author, James J. Harvey, said in his own famous words: “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.”

Well knowing how strongly America feels about the connection of education and National Security (remember the Sputnik, fear of foreign influence during World War I and II–or heck–even the Revolutionary War), you are certain that them are fighting words. That is all it took for the US to launch a counterattack on milk-toast education and fix the exposed threat to our kid’s futures, right?

Well, not quite…Let’s talk more Regan era, then we  have the 90’s to cover, and the fear of millenium change until today.

Follow our conversation and conclusion of History of Public Education by checking www.summercounts.com frequently, or by subscribing or following us on Facebook.

http://summercounts.com/blog/2011/02/02/origin-of-public-education-part-i-the-purpose-of-common-schools/

http://summercounts.com/blog/2011/02/03/origin-of-public-education-part-ii-is-compulsory-just-for-some/

http://summercounts.com/blog/2011/04/12/604/

 http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2002/Gary-Schools.html

http://www.cloudnet.com/~edrbsass/educationhistorytimeline.html

http://www.pbs.org/kcet/publicschool/roots_in_history/choice.html

http://www.aoh61.com/history/bible/nativism_chronology.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-only_movement

http://www.congresslink.org/print_basics_histmats_civilrights64text.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epperson_v._Arkansas

http://www.faculty.piercelaw.edu/redfield/library/case-parc.pennsylvania.htm

Share

History of Public Education III: All for one..but is it one for all?

This is part III in History of Public Education.

In 1916 John Dewey became famed for authoring Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Dewey was a key player in promoting “the progressive political movement,” or “Progressive Education,” which attempts to make schools conduits for a democratic society.

Superintendent William A. Wirt of Gary, Indiana, public schools was also a member of the “Progressive Education” fan-club. Inspired by Dewey and his own Protestant background Wirt believed schools should provide “salvation for its children and community.”

It was thought that home economics was the missing link in American education and much attention given to it. The philosophy went that the labor riots and strikes were due to that families could not balance their household budgets and wives not cook a hot meal, driving the husband’s to drinking in the saloons. Public School, which was now seen as the cure of all society’s ills, was going to step in and save the day.

Gary was a town literally founded and built by U.S Steel Corporation. It was a booming town during the industrial era, with a heterogeneous population.

Wirt ran the school district deliberately and systematically. It was a system designed to yield workers for the booming industrial era and the system conditioning the young trainees was a prime example in its design.

There were two educational plans in Gary, the Work-Study-Play, or the Platoon School Plan. Wirt used the classrooms 24/7 year round—children learning in the day—adults at night. The curriculum included manual training like woodshop for boys and cooking for girls, and other non-academic subjects that had not been typical in classrooms until this point.  Less focus was put on reading, writing and mathematics. After all, only a few could be business owners and organizational leaders. The vast majority would need skills that operated machinery or worked the conveyor belt…or cook meals for their husbands. The students were organized into two platoons who switched schedules for maximum facility efficiency.

Many schools prior to World War I taught foreign languages. Since immigrants were pouring in finding teachers in these native tongues was not an overly difficult task. Immigrant groups tended to stick together and valued perseverance of their language and traditions. One of the most popular foreign languages was German. Hundreds of thousands of kids learned both the German language as well as “about the glories of Germany.” Makes sense since it wasn’t just the German immigrants who thought that German traditions were just swell, but remember, the education leaders had modeled the entire system off the Prussian militant school model.

However, this PDA toward German anything was quickly changed with the Great War.

United States Present Theodor Roosevelt was a  believer in English-only  curriculum and wrote already in 1907, “We have room for but one language in this country and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding house.”

The popularization of this idea was quickly fanned by the brewing international climate and a growing anti-German sentiment. The Great War necessitated renaming to World War I upon the start of World War II. Many immigrants changed their names and refused to teach their children their native language, especially if it was German, to avoid implied affiliation with the Nazis.

“Official English” advocate groups were quick to support with the belief that “the passage of English as the official language will help to expand opportunities for immigrants to learn and speak English, the single greatest empowering tool that immigrants must have to succeed.”

It is interesting that it was the English and Irish influence which was the flavor of national fear just a century before.

Yet equality and fair equal access to education was still much under dispute.

By the 1950’s the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was ready to take its case all the way. It was still commonly believed (and lawful) that education segregation was constitutional as long as separate facilities were equal.  This was certainly not the case. NCAAP organized a group of black parents to attempt to enroll their children in white schools nearby. Among them, Reverend Oliver Brown and his 8-year old daughter Linda.

The case, Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, went all the way to the Supreme Court.

On May 17, 1954, a unanimous decision of the court was announced: “It is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity…is a right which must be available to all on equal terms. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”– Chief Justice Earl Warren

This seems an opportune time in history to ask you, the reader a few Socratic questions: Do you think children are being denied the opportunity of an education “on equal terms” today? Does America have room for more “but one language?” Has public education saved our society from poverty and crime (as per Horace Mann’s prediction), or stopped husbands from going to the bars and become better fathers (as per Wirt)? Do we fear the international influences of other cultures today? Why? How do you predict that such fears (if any) will impact education for future generations?

Follow our conversation and conclusion of History of Public Education by checking www.summercounts.com frequently, or by subscribing below.

http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2002/Gary-Schools.html

http://www.cloudnet.com/~edrbsass/educationhistorytimeline.html

http://www.pbs.org/kcet/publicschool/roots_in_history/choice.html

http://www.aoh61.com/history/bible/nativism_chronology.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-only_movement

Share